Infectious Diseases and Therapy

Importance Several influenza vaccine products are available for older adults, but evidence combining both their absolute effectiveness and head-to-head comparisons within the same large population remains scarce, limiting product-specific vaccination guidance for this high-risk group. Objective To estimate the relative and absolute effectiveness of influenza vaccines against influenza-related hospitalization and in-hospital mortality among older adults. Design, Setting, and Participants Nationwide cohort study using the French National Health Data System (SNDS), including all adults born in 1958 or earlier, living in metropolitan France, at the start of the 2023-2024 campaign. Relative effectiveness (rVE) was assessed using a landmark design with exposure fixed before epidemic onset. Absolute effectiveness (VE) was assessed using a sequential trial emulation with weekly matching of newly vaccinated individuals to yet unvaccinated controls. Follow-up ran from December 5, 2023 to April 19, 2024. Exposures Vaccination with a high-dose (Efluelda) or one of three standard-dose quadrivalent vaccines (Influvac, Fluarix, Vaxigrip), compared individually or by dosage category, and against no vaccination. Main Outcomes and Measures Hospitalization with a diagnosis of influenza and death during such hospitalization. Effectiveness was estimated as 1 minus the hazard ratio from weighted Cox models, with corresponding numbers needed to vaccinate to prevent one case. Results Among 13.8 million eligible individuals, 5.7 million (41%) were vaccinated at the beginning of follow-up. The high-dose vaccine showed greater rVE than standard-dose vaccines against hospitalization (27% [95%CI, 23 to 31%]) and in-hospital death (27% [95%CI,14 to 38%]). Absolute VE was 39% (95%CI, 38 to 41%) against hospitalization and 45% (95%CI, 40 to 49%) against in-hospital death, and was higher for the high-dose vaccine (50%) than standard-dose vaccines (36%) against hospitalization. This difference was most evident among adults 70 years and older, while overall effectiveness declined with age. Conclusions and Relevance In this study, influenza vaccination conferred moderate protection against severe outcomes in older adults, and high-dose vaccination was associated with significantly greater effectiveness than standard-dose vaccines, particularly among adults 70 years and older. These findings support product-level differentiation in vaccination strategy for this population.

Introduction: This study compared the health and economic impact of the 21-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (aPCV21) vs the 20-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV20) on invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) and post-meningitis sequelae (PMS) among adults aged 65 years and older in the United Kingdom (UK). Methods: A published Markov model was used to simulate a single-cohort of vaccine-naive adults who became eligible for age-based vaccination at age 65 years, with uptake occurring over time. The cohort was followed until a maximum age of 100 years. Model inputs were derived from publicly available national health data and published reports. Outcomes were discounted at 3.5% annually, and costs were adjusted to the 2024 Great Britain Pound ({pound}). Additional analyses explored the impact of changing the age-based recommendation from 65 years to 75 years. Scenarios involving instantaneous vaccine uptake rates were included as part of the sensitivity analyses. A deterministic sensitivity analysis was performed on the incremental direct medical costs between vaccinating with aPCV21 vs PCV20 under the age-based recommendation of 65 years. Results: Using an age-based recommendation of 65 years, aPCV21 led to fewer cases, deaths, and costs than PCV20. Compared with PCV20, aPCV21 averted an additional 138 IPD cases, 1 PMS case, and 22 IPD deaths, saving {pound}1.2 million in direct medical costs. Raising the age-based recommendation from 65 to 75 years and using aPCV21 (or PCV20, respectively), resulted in 120 (92) additional IPD cases, 2 (1) additional PMS case(s), 19 (14) additional IPD death(s), and an extra {pound}1.1 ({pound}0.8) million in direct medical costs. The deterministic sensitivity analysis showed that aPCV21 reduced direct medical costs across all parameter ranges. Conclusions: Compared with PCV20, aPCV21 prevented more IPD cases, IPD deaths, and direct medical costs among older adults in the UK. Changing the age-based recommendation from age 65 to 75 resulted in worse health and economic outcomes. Key words. Pneumococcal infections; pneumococcal vaccines; vaccines, conjugate; serotype; United Kingdom; health costs

Purpose: To compare the efficacy and safety of intravenous cefazolin versus antistaphylococcal penicillins for the treatment of MSSA bacteremia in adults using evidence exclusively from randomized controlled trials. Methods: We searched 5 databases for RCTs comparing definitive intravenous cefazolin with ASPs (oxacillin, cloxacillin, flucloxacillin, nafcillin) in adults with MSSA bacteremia. Primary outcomes were 90-day all-cause mortality and acute kidney injury (AKI). Secondary outcomes included adverse event-related treatment discontinuation and persistent bacteremia (>72h). Dichotomous outcomes were synthesized as risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using random-effects models with Paule-Mandel estimation and Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman inference. Fixed-effect Mantel-Haenszel models were performed as sensitivity analyses. Results: Two RCTs randomized 1,656 participants (SNAP, n = 1,341; CloCeBa, n = 315), of whom 1,579 contributed to the 90-day mortality analysis. There was no statistically significant difference in 90-day mortality (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.57-1.41; I2 = 0%). Both trials favoured cefazolin for acute kidney injury, but the random-effects estimate was highly imprecise (RR 0.26, 95% CI 0.00-939,970.59; I2 = 81.7%). Treatment discontinuation also favoured cefazolin directionally, although the random-effects estimate was imprecise (RR 0.24, 95% CI 0.00-24.41; I2 = 36.2%). Microbiological outcomes were synthesized narratively because definitions and assessment time points differed between trials. Conclusion: Randomized evidence supports cefazolin as a potential definitive treatment option when adequate source control, appropriate antimicrobial dosing, and clinical monitoring can be achieved. However, the limited number of trials and imprecision in pooled estimates warrant cautious interpretation.

Objectives: To evaluate the epidemiological evolution of unique pneumococcal serotypes covered by either PCV20 or PCV21, common serotypes by both vaccines and non-vaccine serotypes in adults. Methods: We characterized all national IPD clinical isolates from January 2009 to June 2026. Results: The highest burden of IPD was caused by serotypes shared between PCV20 and PCV21 with serotypes 3 and 8 the most prevalent in adults of all ages. During the pre-pandemic period, IPD caused by unique-PCV20 serotypes declined probably due to herd protection by paediatric vaccination with PCVs. In contrast, unique-PCV21 serotypes increased in incidence accounting for more cases than unique-PCV20 serotypes. However, after the COVID-19 pandemic, a different pattern was observed with unique-PCV20 serotypes increasing in incidence due a marked rise in IPD caused by serotypes 4 and 14 that has progressively reduced the gap in disease coverage. In adults aged 18-64 years, the fraction of disease that could be prevented with PCV20/PCV21 changed from 5% in favour of PCV21 (years 2022/2023) to 15% in favour of PCV20 (year 2026) whereas in adults [≥]65 years the vaccine contribution declined from 20% in favour of PCV21 (year 2022) to 8% in 2026. Conclusions: IPD trends in adults have changed after the COVID-19 pandemic, especially in recent years. Our study emphasizes the rapid re-emergence of infections caused by traditional PCV7 serotypes especially serotypes 4 and 14 and reinforce the idea that the use of broader PCVs must be accompanied by an increase in the uptake rates in adults of all ages.

Neutralizing antibodies are a correlate of protection (CoP) of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine efficacy. However, data informing CoPs often explicitly exclude people on immunosuppressive therapies who are at an increased risk of symptomatic and severe COVID-19, delayed viral clearance, and death. Investigating the relationship between antibodies and protection for people on immunosuppressive therapies could provide insights into mechanisms of protection. We performed a systematic search to identify studies reporting SARS-CoV-2 binding antibody levels after mRNA vaccination in people with hematological malignancies, neurological disorders, rheumatic diseases, and mixed immune-mediated inflammatory disorders (IMIDs) on immunosuppressive therapies including B-cell depletion, JAK inhibitors, and S1P inhibitors, as well as healthy controls. Binding antibody levels varied between cohorts receiving different immunosuppressive treatments. Compared to healthy controls the lowest antibody levels were observed in subjects treated with B-cell depletion (54.5-fold reduction, 95% CI: 34.5-86.2) and S1P inhibitors (24.8-fold reduction, 95% CI: 13.2-46.7). To assess the association between antibody level and protection, we used data from a previous study of COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness in people with the same underlying conditions. We linked vaccine effectiveness estimates with the predicted antibody level in people on immunosuppressive therapies (using antibody data including this meta-analysis of binding antibody levels). Predicted neutralizing antibody levels were correlated with vaccine effectiveness both for infection and hospitalization (p<0.0001 and p<0.0001, respectively). However, we found that for any given antibody level, people who are immunosuppressed had lower protection against infection and hospitalization than a healthy population.

Background: Host response and biomarker research to advance sepsis therapeutics requires well-characterized cohorts with longitudinal biospecimens across a range of hosts and infections. Automated screening based on SIRS criteria is sensitive but nonspecific and identifies more candidates than research teams can approach, sample, and follow longitudinally. We evaluated a structured enrichment review by non-physician study staff, done after automated screening in a hospital-wide prospective sepsis cohort. Methods: The CISID cohort is a prospective observational study of hospitalized patients with suspected sepsis, enrolling adults from the ED, inpatient wards, and ICUs at a tertiary academic medical center. Patients were identified through: (1) automated electronic health record screening for two or more SIRS criteria with a 24-hour lookback, documentation of microbiologic culture or PCR, and receipt of a new antibiotic; (2) a sepsis enrichment step of structured chart review by trained non-physician study staff; and (3) discussion with the primary clinical team. Enrolled patients underwent physician adjudication into four diagnostic categories. To evaluate the enrichment step, we analyzed all patients screened during a 9-week period, assigned a composite "sepsis-likely" variable (CDC Adult Sepsis Event criteria or ICD-10 code R65.20/R65.21 within 48 hours before or after screening), and assessed mortality across each stage of screening. We also assessed concordance of the composite with physician adjudication among enrolled patients. Results: From November 2023 through February 2026, 4,318 patients screened in through EHR-based automated screening; 1,220 (28%) were flagged for enrollment, and 288 were enrolled. Physician adjudication classified 209 (73%) as sepsis, 46 (16%) as infection without sepsis, 14 (5%) were classified as undifferentiated critical illness, and 19 (6.6%) as non-infectious sepsis mimics. Patients with sepsis were severely ill (median SOFA score, 9; ICU admission, 80%; shock, 48%), and 51% were immunocompromised; mortality was 14% in hospital and 27% at 90 days. In a 9-week sample of 907 screened encounters, 21% of those deferred and 70% of those flagged for enrollment met the sepsis-likely composite, a 3.3-fold increase in prevalence after structured study team review. Conclusions: A brief structured enrichment review after automated screening tripled the prevalence of EHR-based sepsis indicators among patients selected for enrollment, while concentrating enrollment efforts on roughly one-quarter of screened-in patients in this hospital-wide, all-source suspected-sepsis cohort. This approach may help prospective cohorts direct limited biospecimen resources toward patients most informative for host-response and biomarker research.

Objectives To evaluate the impact of COVID-19 vaccination on the prevention of long COVID (LC) in the Omicron era through an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods We performed an update of our previously published systematic review and meta-analysis of vaccination and LC risk (searches between 1 January 2022 and 1 March 2024). Databases (Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, Europe PMC, LILACS, Cochrane COVID-19 Study Register) were searched for studies published between 1 March 2024 and 13 July 2026. Observational studies assessing the impact of vaccination on the risk of LC four or more weeks after SARS-CoV-2 infection were included. Vaccines were restricted to those centrally authorised in the European Union. Random-effects meta-analyses, restricted to adults, were performed to calculate pooled odds ratios (OR) of LC in three comparisons: vaccinated (any dose) versus unvaccinated; booster vaccination versus unvaccinated; and booster vaccination versus primary course vaccination only. Results Nineteen new studies were identified, of which ten were included in the updated meta-analyses alongside eight studies from the original review. The pooled OR of LC in vaccinated adults (any dose) versus unvaccinated was 0.75 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.67-0.84; 13 studies). ORs were also lower for booster vaccination versus unvaccinated (0.73; 95% CI 0.65-0.82; 6 studies), and booster vaccination versus primary course vaccination (0.63; 95% CI 0.53-0.75; 6 studies). Significant associations between vaccination and lower LC odds were observed in subgroup analyses of mRNA-only vaccination and LC outcomes three or more months after infection. Conclusions This updated review and meta-analysis reinforces our previous finding that vaccination may reduce the burden of LC in the Omicron era, with booster doses potentially providing additional protection. Although evidence in high-risk groups now prioritised for vaccination in most countries remains limited, these findings clearly demonstrate the benefits of vaccination and support current seasonal vaccination strategies.

ObjectivesRespiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) vaccine policies have varied globally since their approval in 2023. In the UK, policy has adapted in line with National evidence generation such that from Autumn 2026 at-risk persons [&ge;]65 years old will become eligible for vaccination. Immunosuppressed persons <65 years will still not be offered protection. The objective of this study is to investigate the relative burden of RSV infection by age and immunosuppressed status (IC). DesignRetrospective observational cohort study using routine healthcare data from North West London Integrated Care System. ParticipantsPatients with a confirmed diagnosis of a respiratory viral infection (RSV, Influenza A and B, SARS-CoV2) between October 2021 and July 2025. Main outcomes measuresPrevalence and severity of RSV infection in immunosuppressed persons <65 years old, and to provide a comparative analysis with Influenza and SARS-CoV2 in a sub-cohort tested using a 4-in-1 combined rapid PCR test. ResultsDuring the study period, 1226 patients were diagnosed with RSV of whom 596 (48.6%) were <65 years old. In 1091 patients with clinical data, 341 (31.3%) were IC. Fifty (9.9%) patients <65 years old had severe infection (ICU admission or death within 28 days of diagnosis), of whom 14 (28.0%) were IC. Proportionally, 16.7% of all RSV-associated deaths and 55.1% of all ICU RSV-admissions occurred in adult patients <65 years old. RSV accounted for 665 (10.1%) infections confirmed by 4-in-1 viral PCR testing. Eight-nine (13.4%), 172 (9.3%) and 448 (12.0%) patients with RSV, Influenza A and SARS-COV2 experienced severe infection, of whom 32 (36.0%), 82 (47.7%) and 156 (34.8%) were <65 years old respectively. Eight (25.0%), 20 (24.4%) and 52 (33.3%) of patients <65 years old with severe infection were IC. On adjusted analysis, having an immunosuppressive condition increased the odds of a severe SARS-CoV2 infection, OR (95% CI) 1.36 (1.08-1.71) but not a severe RSV or Influenza infection. ConclusionsSevere RSV infections occur in persons <65 years old, with a significant proportion of patients having an immunosuppressive condition. Urgent research is needed to investigate the potential benefit of extending the current UK RSV vaccine policy to protect younger immunosuppressed adults.

There is currently no clinical data for the effectiveness of the only licensed Ebola virus disease vaccine (Ervebo) against Bundibugyo virus disease. A number of studies have shown immune cross-reactivity with Bundibugyo virus after Ervebo vaccination. However, antibody recognition of Bundibugyo is around 2.8-fold lower than recognition of Ebola virus. Here, we aimed to infer how a 2.8-fold drop in immune recognition may affect Ervebo protection against Bundibugyo virus disease based on analysis of data on Ervebo immunogenicity and protection from Ebola virus disease. This work has three main components. Firstly, we analysed the timing of vaccine protection in the Ervebo pivotal ring vaccination clinical trial. Secondly, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of antibody responses to Ebola virus after Ervebo vaccination over time. Thirdly, we combined these data with previously reported data on the cross-reactivity to Bundibugyo virus to infer protection of Ervebo against Bundibugyo virus disease. We find that the clinical trial data for Ervebo supports vaccine protection beginning earlier than 10 days after vaccination. Secondly, binding antibody levels against Ebola virus on day 28 post vaccination (peak responses) were on average 12.9-fold (95% confidence interval, CI: 6.4 - 26.0) higher than on day 7, 6.3-fold (95% CI: 3.7 -10.8) higher than on day 10, and 2.5-fold (95% CI: 1.4 - 4.4) higher than on day 14 (neutralising antibodies showed similar results). Finally, we consider the scenarios where antibody levels to Ebola virus at day 7 or 10 are putative protective thresholds against Ebola virus disease, and we assume these thresholds also apply for Bundibugyo virus disease. Then, with a 2.8-fold reduction of responses to Bundibugyo compared to Ebola virus, we predict antibody responses to Bundibugyo virus after Ervebo vaccination are likely above these putative protective thresholds.

Consumer-grade wearables can continuously and longitudinally measure health signals such as heart rate (HR), activity, and sleep. While changes in these signals have been implicated in the early detection of infection (e.g., influenza, SARS-CoV-2) and real-time alerting systems have been developed, evidence from prospective deployment in pediatric transplant households remains limited. Here, we study the application of a resting heart rate (RHR)-based real-time alerting algorithm to detect respiratory virus infection in a cohort of solid organ transplant recipients and their household members (n=146) in a Phase IV clinical trial (NCT06161454). Reliable and efficient alerting for infection events may be particularly relevant for this population, enabling isolation, clinical management, and/or treatment. Of 31 antigen-test outcomes, nearly all (29/31, 93.5%) correspond to either influenza, COVID, or other patient-reported symptoms. We describe RHR, HR, activity, and sleep/circadian rhythm features around clinical alarm events, identifying candidate features for further investigation and algorithm improvement.

Background: Filoviruses, specifically Ebola virus (EBOV), Bundibugyo virus (BDBV), and Marburg virus (MARV), have been the etiologic agents of multiple outbreaks of severe disease in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). Two EBOV-specific vaccine regimens have been approved for use in outbreak scenarios, including the Ad26.ZEBOV/MVA-BN-Filo (Zabdeno/Mvabea) two-dose vaccine, where the MVA-BN-Filo booster dose contains EBOV, MARV, and Sudan (SUDV) virus glycoproteins (GPs) and the nucleoprotein from Tai Forest virus. While long-term immunogenicity of up to two years has been found in clinical trial settings, limited real-world data exists. Methods: Using a multiplexed immunoassay, samples (n=698 at baseline) collected in Mbandaka, Equateur province, DRC, between September 2023 and October 2024 were assessed for seroreactivity to six filovirus antigens (1 BDBV, 2 EBOV, 2 MARV, and 1 SUDV) at three distinct periods: baseline/pre-vaccination, 6-8 weeks post-first dose (Zabdeno), at booster administration (Mvabea), and one-year post-boost dose. Results: Substantial filovirus seroreactivity was found at baseline, with 48.7% (n=340/698) of individuals being seroreactive to at least one virus antigen. High baseline seroreactivity was found against BDBV GP (31.1%, n=217/698), with lower baseline seroreactivity to EBOV GP (15.5%, n=106/698), comparatively. Overall EBOV GP seroreactivity increased to 66.8% (n=376/563) at one year-post vaccine boost and 57.6% (n=250/434) of participants were seroreactive. Despite the booster dose inclusion of SUDV GP and MARV GP, there were no substantial increases in reactivity against either antigen at subsequent timepoints. Overall filovirus seroreactivity increased at all timepoints for the entire cohort, although filovirus reactivity decreased over the study period for those who were seroreactive at baseline. Findings: These data highlight detection of significantly elevated seoreactivity to EBOV GP following first-dose administration of Ad26.ZEBOV, which remained relatively stable one-year post-booster dose administration. Additionally, this study identifies high levels of baseline seroreactivity to BDBV GP despite no previous documented outbreaks in this region of DRC. These data suggest that vaccination with the Ad26.ZEBOV-MVA-BN-Filo vaccine induces stable seroreactivity against EBOV GP, but not to other filovirus antigens.

Background: Child-friendly sample collection methods are needed to improve microbiological tuberculosis diagnosis in children. We assessed the feasibility, diagnostic yield, safety, tolerability, and acceptability of nasopharyngeal aspirates (NPA) and stool sample collection for XpertMTB/RIF Ultra (Ultra) testing in children <5 years with severe pneumonia in six high tuberculosis incidence countries. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional mixed-methods study (10/2020-03/2021) nested within the TB-Speed Pneumonia trial (NCT03831906) in 15 tertiary hospitals. Uptake and diagnostic yield of NPA and stool, sampled by trained nurses, were computed. Nurses documented NPA feasibility and related adverse events. NPA tolerability was assessed through discomfort/distress/pain scales completed by nurses, parents/caregivers, and children >3 years. Individual interviews investigated nurses and parents/caregivers perceptions and experiences of both procedures. Results: Of 542 children enrolled, 541 (99.8%) and 423 (75.5%) had NPA and stool samples successfully collected, respectively; 8 (1.5%) had positive Ultra on any sample, 8 (1.5%) on NPA, and 3 (0.6%) on stool samples. Nurses reported that NPA was difficult to collect in 27 (5.0%) children. 130 (24%) children had bloodstained NPA samples and <5% experienced transient heart rate deceleration, digestive or respiratory distress during NPA. Median nurse-assessed tolerability scores were 1/10 [0,3] before and 5/10 [2,6] during NPA. Although most respondents perceived NPA as painful, all appreciated that NPA aimed to improve child health. Nurses reported that NPA and stool collection was quicker, less invasive than gastric aspiration. Parents/caregivers trusted nurses skills and valued the novelty of NPA. All respondents easily engaged in stool collection, but were frustrated to depend on children passing stool. Nurses underlined that continuous staff training and mentoring would sustain feasibility and self-efficacy in obtaining adequate samples. Conclusions: NPA and stool are viable specimen collection options for microbiological diagnosis of tuberculosis in young children <5 years with severe pneumonia in high tuberculosis incidence countries.

Introduction: In vivo, temporal, and personalized data on immunological-antibiotic interactions may provide richer, earlier information that improves infection treatment. To test this hypothesis, we applied a proof-of-concept approach to evaluate a non-reductionist methodology. Methods: A non-reductionist, data-driven, pattern recognition-based combinatorial method that captures relationships was evaluated with blood leukocyte data collected from 401 individuals from Greece [n=331] and the US [n=70] who experienced sepsis, pneumonia, endocarditis, tuberculosis, syphilis, skin and soft tissue, intra-abdominal, or urinary tract infections associated with meningitis. Results: While ambiguity was observed when variables were measured in isolation by a reductionist alternative, ambiguity was prevented and hidden information was uncovered when complex dynamics were assessed by the non-reductionist method. The combinatorial approach grouped together observations that displayed similar immune profiles, distinguished those with different mortality risks, identified antibiotics that modulated specific leukocytes, differentiated two types of non-responsiveness (associated or not associated with antibiotics), and facilitated earlier and personalized evaluation of therapies. For instance, in tuberculosis, blood monocytes were modulated by isoniazid-related antimicrobials. Discussion: Across numerous syndromes, the non-reductionist method extracted more information from the same data than the reductionist alternative. If corroborated, non-reductionist methodologies may promote research and support personalized medicine.

Background Mortality in sepsis is often considered a direct consequence of infection and organ dysfunction, although many deaths occur after withdrawal of life sustaining treatment. The clinical factors leading to these decisions and their implications for interpreting sepsis mortality are not well characterized. Methods We performed a secondary analysis of a prospective observational cohort of adults with physician adjudicated sepsis at a tertiary academic medical center. Patients who transitioned to comfort measures only (CMO) during the index hospitalization underwent structured chart review to characterize baseline health and functional status, clinical severity, care preferences, anticipated outcomes following survival, and the primary reason for CMO transition. Results Among 239 patients with adjudicated sepsis, 42 (17.6%) transitioned to CMO. These patients had substantial underlying disease, including malignancy in 76% and immunocompromised status in 62%. However, 88% lived at home before hospitalization, 52% were independent in activities of daily living, an additional 26% were partially independent, and 90% were full code on admission. Progressive multi organ failure (19%), refractory septic shock (19%), and irreversible respiratory failure (12%) accounted for half of CMO transitions, while advanced frailty (5%) and poor baseline functional status (2%) were infrequent primary reasons. Median time from admission to CMO was 16 days (IQR 7 to 33), and median time from admission to death was 18 days (IQR 11 to 35). Anticipated ventilator dependence (62%), dialysis dependence (36%), and cognitive impairment frequently influenced goals of care discussions. Overall, 38 patients died during the index hospitalization, and 35 (92%) of these deaths followed transition to CMO. Conclusions Most CMO transitions in this cohort occurred after an evolving course of severe sepsis and were driven primarily by progressive organ dysfunction and failure to recover rather than advanced frailty or poor baseline function. These findings identify failure to recover after the acute septic insult as an important clinical trajectory and highlight the need to account for treatment limitation when interpreting sepsis mortality. Understanding why some patients recover from sepsis associated organ dysfunction while others progress to irreversible organ failure may help identify patients and mechanisms for future therapeutic intervention.

Typhoid intestinal perforation (TIP) is a late complication of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi infection, and blood cultures, if available, are often negative at this stage, making etiologic confirmation challenging. In areas without access to blood culture diagnostics, TIP incidence can serve as a proxy for enteric fever burden. Antibodies against hemolysin E (HlyE) and S. Typhi lipopolysaccharide (LPS) are promising serologic markers for typhoid, but their diagnostic utility for TIP remains unclear. In this study, we assessed the diagnostic accuracy of anti-HlyE and anti-LPS IgG and IgA antibodies measured by kinetic enzyme immunoassay in children undergoing emergency laparotomy for acute abdomen in Niger. Dried blood spots (DBS) were collected pre-operatively (baseline) and within 30 days post-hospital discharge (convalescence). Patients classified intraoperatively as TIP (n = 341) or as confirmed non-typhoid-related alternative etiology (i.e., controls, n = 48) were included in this serologic analysis. The primary analyses were conducted in a longitudinal sub-cohort of 122 TIP cases and 33 controls in whom all four anti-HlyE and anti-LPS IgA and IgG responses were measured at baseline and at convalescence. Anti-HlyE IgA and anti-LPS IgA were additionally measured at baseline in the full analytic cohort. In the primary analysis, all antigen-antibody isotype combinations distinguished TIP cases from controls with high accuracy: anti-HlyE IgA (AUC 0.94), anti-HlyE IgG (AUC 0.94), anti-LPS IgA (AUC 0.96), and anti-LPS IgG (AUC 0.96). Anti-HlyE IgA and anti-LPS IgA performed similarly in the full cohort (AUC 0.93 and 0.93, respectively), supporting the representativeness of the sub-cohort. Anti-LPS IgG showed the best overall performance (99% sensitivity, 94% specificity), exceeding that of all other individual markers, and combining markers did not improve diagnostic accuracy. Diagnostic performance at convalescence was similar to or lower than that observed at presentation. Overall, anti-HlyE and anti-LPS antibodies showed high diagnostic accuracy for TIP at presentation, extending the potential utility of these serologic markers for supporting the diagnosis of typhoid-associated intestinal perforation and improving surveillance of severe typhoid disease when patients present with late-stage complications. Our findings show that serologic testing could improve case detection and burden estimation of enteric fever and its complications in resource-limited settings.

Background Killed whole-cell oral cholera vaccines require multiple doses and have reduced efficacy in young children, limiting their utility. PanChol is a single-dose, oral live-attenuated cholera vaccine engineered from a current seventh pandemic El Tor O1 Vibrio cholerae strain. PanChol was shown to be safe and immunogenic in a previous phase 1a trial. In participants from this first-in-human trial, we aimed to assess the durability of the initial PanChol dose and the safety and immunogenicity of a second dose. Methods This open-label phase 1a booster study was conducted at Brigham and Women's Hospital (Boston, MA). Eligible participants were healthy adults aged 18-55 years without a history of cholera or gastrointestinal disorders and had received a PanChol dose ranging from 105-1010 colony-forming units (CFU) within the previous 322-1111 days. All participants received a booster dose of 2x107 CFU. The primary outcome was safety, including solicited, unsolicited, and serious adverse events following the second dose of PanChol. Secondary endpoints were the magnitude of pre- and post-vaccination serum vibriocidal titers to both Inaba and Ogawa V. cholerae, including seroconversion (4-fold rise in titers over baseline), and stool shedding of PanChol organisms using quantitative and qualitative stool cultures. Comparisons of the amount of vaccine shedding in stool following primary and secondary immunization were used to assess the intestinal mucosal immunity elicited by the initial PanChol dose. All outcomes were assessed in all participants. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05657782, and is complete. Findings Between Aug 25, 2025, and Feb 20, 2026, 20 healthy adults who previously received a single oral dose of PanChol were enrolled to receive a booster dose of 2x107 CFU. Eleven (55%) of 20 participants were male and the median age was 43{middle dot}6 (IQR 30{middle dot}2-49{middle dot}5). Ten (50%) were White and 17 (85%) were not Hispanic or Latino. Nine (45%) of 20 boost recipients reported at least one solicited adverse event; 13 (93%) of 14 events were mild, and all were transient. The most common solicited adverse event was nausea, reported by 4 (20%) participants; all cases were mild. Most unsolicited adverse events were mild; one was grade 3 and was deemed unrelated to vaccination. Two unsolicited adverse events were deemed related to vaccination (mild gassy sensation and heartburn, both of which occurred on day 1 and resolved the same day). In most participants, vibriocidal antibody titers measured on the day of boosting exceeded baseline titers prior to the initial dose (17 (85%) for Inaba and 14 (70%) for Ogawa). Fifteen (75%) of 20 boost recipients seroconverted vibriocidal antibody titers to both serotypes. After the boost, 17 (85%) participants had no or self-limited vaccine shedding, compared with 10% after the first PanChol dose. Interpretation A second oral dose of PanChol had a favorable safety profile and induced vibriocidal seroconversion to both serotypes in 75% of boost recipients. Intestinal colonization of PanChol following the boost serves as a proxy for measuring mucosal immunity targeting V. cholerae. The decrease in in the abundance of PanChol fecal shedding following the second dose, compared with the first, suggests that a single dose of PanChol is sufficient to confer durable protective immunity against a cholera challenge. These observations underscore the need for further clinical development of PanChol. Funding Wellcome Trust.

Objective: To evaluate the specimen-level performance of a multichannel electronic nose (e-nose) sensor array in classifying stool specimens into relevant Clostridioides difficile categories. Design: Retrospective single-center validation study with reference to polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and C. difficile toxin testing. Participants: A convenience sample of 31 discarded stool specimens with PCR and confirmatory toxin testing. Categorized into PCR-positive (+)/toxin+, PCR+/toxin-negative (-), and PCR-. Methods: Specimens were sampled in controlled headspace by two e-nose sensor arrays in 10-minute sessions with 5-second sampling intervals. The primary endpoint was one-versus rest classification performance (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and accuracy) into three classes: PCR+/toxin+, PCR+/toxin-, and PCR-. Data were normalized and the region of interest was extracted for training and testing. Random forests were utilized for classification of normalized data with a test-train split at the specimen-level. Results: There were 457 unique 10-minute sampling events (147 PCR+/toxin+, 183 PCR+/toxin-, 127 PCR-). Sensors 1 and 2 captured 20,331 and 23,538 unique 5-second exposures within the region of interest, respectively. Testing data classification accuracy was 0.79 [0.78, 0.81] and 0.84 [0.83, 0.85] for Sensors 1 and 2. Sensitivity for PCR+/toxin+ exposures was 0.82 [0.79, 0.84] and 0.94 [0.92, 0.95], and specificity was 0.91[0.90, 0.93] and 0.93 [0.92, 0.94] for Sensors 1 and 2. Conclusion: An e-nose sensor array partially differentiated PCR-classified C. difficile specimen classes at the exposure level under headspace-controlled conditions. Performance was strongest for PCR+/toxin+ exposures. Findings support further prospective validation in the hospital room setting.

Background. Persistent SARS-CoV-2 antigen is a leading hypothesis for post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC), commonly known as Long COVID. Impaired Fc-mediated antiviral antibody function could contribute to inefficient clearance of infected cells and viral antigen despite preserved antibody levels. Therefore, we tested whether PASC is associated with altered Fc{gamma} receptor-mediated antibody function and differences in IgG1 Fc fucosylation, a major regulator of Fc effector function. Methods. Serum samples from RECOVER-Adult participants with prior SARS-CoV-2 infection (99 PASC, 139 non-PASC) were analyzed for anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike receptor-binding domain (RBD) IgG and subclasses, Fc{gamma}RIIIa- and Fc{gamma}RIIa-mediated reporter activity as surrogate measures of antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) and antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis (ADCP), anti-RBD IgG1 Fc glycosylation, and circulating fucose-modifying enzymes. Results. Despite higher anti-RBD IgG and IgG1 abundance, PASC sera showed lower ADCC- and ADCP-associated Fc{gamma}R reporter activity, including after normalization for antibody abundance. Anti-RBD IgG1 showed greater fucosylation in PASC samples (30 PASC, 34 non-PASC). Serum FUCA2 was lower in PASC samples (24 PASC, 34 non-PASC), whereas FUCA1 and soluble CD16a levels did not differ between the two groups. Conclusion. PASC is associated with impaired antiviral IgG Fc function, increased IgG1 Fc fucosylation, and reduced circulating FUCA2, identifying a glycoimmune axis that may contribute to impaired Fc-dependent antigen clearance and represents a potentially targetable pathway in Long COVID.

Macrolides remain the first-line antimicrobial treatment for pertussis, primarily caused by Bordetella pertussis. Emergence of macrolide-resistant B. pertussis in Australia and globally presents a growing concern for clinical management. As molecular diagnosis predominates for pertussis, limited numbers of cultures are available for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. The A2037G mutation in the 23S rRNA gene is most commonly associated with macrolide resistance in B. pertussis, yet no commercial molecular assay is available for its detection. In this study, we adapted and validated a previously published real-time PCR assay as a laboratory developed test (LDT) on the Panther Fusion(R) system using Open Access functionality to detect the macrolide resistance-associated mutation in B. pertussis from culture isolates and clinical specimens. Total turnaround time was ~2.5 h for the first result and 2-3 min for subsequent results in the same batch, with an estimated cost of AUD 18 per sample, excluding labour. A total of 30 samples were included in the validation panel to assess assay performance. All isolates and clinical specimens in the validation panel produced results concordant with the expected mutation status, demonstrating 100% accuracy, sensitivity and specificity. The assay demonstrated a limit of detection of 1.5 x 103 CFU/mL (22 CFU/reaction). This Panther Fusion(R) LDT provides a rapid and fully automated approach for molecular detection of the targeted mutation associated with macrolide resistance in B. pertussis. Its integration into routine molecular workflows as a reflex test following identification of B. pertussis may facilitate timely identification of resistant infections.

Routine facility-based testing for hepatitis C virus (HCV) remains underutilised in India despite national screening policy. WHO has recommended HCV self-testing (HCVST) since 2021 to increase access to testing services. This study evaluated the HCVST by assessing its reach and uptake in urban-slum communities within Haridwar, Uttarakhand, India. The implementation study (CTRI/2023/07/054590) took place between 12th July 2023 and 31st August 2024. Three Primary Healthcare Centre (PHC) catchment areas were assigned to deliver either (1) facility-based HCVST, (2) home-based HCVST, or (3) standard of care (SoC). Facility-based delivery involved trained users offering kits to patients visiting the PHC (Site 1: Jwalapur 1), whereas home-based delivery (Site 2: Jwalapur 2) involved trained users and ASHAs approaching community households selected via a KISH grid. Primary outcomes were OPD-footfall standardized operational reach; the proportion offered testing out of the PHC catchement areas footfall, and uptake (acceptance among those offered). Secondary analysis explored demographic and behavioural predictors of those that refused to test. Of 7,091 outpatient department (OPD) footfall, 724 (10.2%) individuals were offered HCVST at intervention sites, of which 465 (64.2%) agreed to self-test. Operational reach was 17.8% (393/2,212; 95% CI: 16.2 to 19.5%) through the facility-based intervention and 14.4% (331/2,296; 95% CI: 13.0 to 15.9%) in the home-based intervention.HCVST uptake was higher through the home-based model (71.9%, 238/331, 95% CI: 66.7 to 76.7%) than in the facility (57.8%, 227/393, 95% CI: 52.7 to 62.7%). At the SoC site, only 11 individuals received standard of care HCV testing. The study HCV positivity was 1.1% (5/465; 95% CI: 0.35% to 2.49%): with four testing positive at the facility site (4/227), one at the community site (1/238), and none at the SoC site (0/11). Men were more likely to refuse HCVST than women (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.78, p=0.001).Participants in the facility-based model had 1.87 times higher odds of refusal compared to those in the home-based delivery model. There is minimal routine HCV testing in the OPD setting of Urban PHCs despite national screening policy. HCVST improved testing coverage and uptake in urban slums compared to SoC. However, HCV positivity was low overall, suggesting that untargeted screening - whether facility-based or home-based - may identify few infections without additional strategies to reach higher-risk populations.